Psychoeconomics: globalization, markets, crisis - стр. 25

.’ (Diderot). In this way there is created, on the one hand, a constantly extending market for gold and silver, unconnected with their functions as money, and, on the other hand, a latent source of supply, to which recourse is had principally in times of crisis and social disturbance.”

In essence, Karl Marx reaches a conclusion about the oscillating changes of economic values – from material to esthetic, psychological, depending on the cycle of economic development. Let us now turn our attention to the fact that we are speaking here of the rise of the psychological function of wealth in proportion to its growth. We are also speaking of the psychological peculiarities of people who are occupied with accumulation and so forth.

Values oscillate between the real and fictitious economy. The price of shares is more suited for the imagination of hysteroids, for the fantasy of auditory types. For kinesthetic types, or domain experts, the variation in the prices of gold, oil or raw materials is more familiar… With the change in the balance of psychotypes of the economically active population, or more precisely with the change in the fundamental metaprograms of these psychotypes, the monetary balance of these assets also changes. Naturally this change is not total, but occurs at the level of cumulative causes: one metaprogram has barely changed in one market participant, in another, in a third etc. And that’s how the market unfolds… We must bear in mind that in each person there are both a kinetic and audial beginning. Most commonly this is a transformation, a correction in the psychotype of specific individuals. The first one changes a little, then the second does, then the third… the accumulation of these changes constitutes another movement in the market… Naturally, indoctrination, mimesis, conformity and other processes are active here that regulate the transmission of information from one person to another, and regulate socio-psychological processes. These swings have become cyclical, while thanks to globalization they penetrate the economically active population, the economy of the majority of countries.

But where does the opinion of economists themselves come down on this topic? By analyzing the appended chart of cyclical interrelationship of the price of material and immaterial assets, they have reached the conclusion that between stock prices and the price of non-monetary assets there are 16 annual cycles. This is so whether we count from the minima or maxima. But is it accidental that in our case for each psychotype, two maximum peaks of solar radiation occur and that three times 16 exactly gives 48? This is the minimal value of the Kondratiev cycle, and the two psychotypes that provide intensive development are resonators and postresonators.