In resonance with cosmic energies: terrorism and marketing - стр. 10

Yes, physicists dispute about the presence or the absence of the ether and cosmic energies, of their nature. Let them argue. We have experimental evidence that the increase in the density of essential flows (sharp decline in the Earth's rotation), is related with the peaks of changes in the development of society, people's mental activity. And the most difficult problems of humanity are connected with psycho-cosmic energies, i.e. the part of the spectrum of various cosmic energies that affect our mental, physiological activity. But most importantly: our research has shown that the human brain, our EEG are more sensitive than all the physicists created sophisticated instrument responds to changes in the density of ether flows. Knowledge achieve high predictability when it is the result of the development of various sciences. Therefore, we will not discard and other scientific assessments.

But let’s stay pragmatic and remain at the level of common sense and in an embrace with the data of those scientists that measure, record, touch a real phenomenon, and not theoretically soar in the clouds, in speculation, in theories without facts.

The uneven development of a society, the economy is difficult to explain without using the original, proven facts and common sense knowledge about the ether.

Without this knowledge, we cannot explain the reasons for the appearance and disappearance of the long waves of economic development cycles that were empirically fixed by N. Kondratyev and other scientists. Such cycles in the economy used to be – that's for sure. Likewise, they disappeared. Why? The reasons are different. But there is one detail. These cycles, as well as the dynamics of terror coincide up to a year – ten years to the dynamics of change in the density of the cosmic ether. There is other amazing coincidence of changes in the ether density, socio-economic and spiritual processes in the world.

We will not get involved in the discussion on this matter of physicists. There is a fierce struggle of different scientific schools and different types of personalities, classical and new physics. It is quest for the truth and for financial flows, for the status of science, which brings a lot of dividends. Imagine, that some abstract scientists have found their niche in the distribution of financial flows in the system of scientific hierarchy. They were going to it all their lifes. And suddenly announced that the foundation on which they built their research achievements are not accurate, not true. So after all, these scientists should be changed to those who hold more promising scientific theories, concepts. And they are all in the opposition… It was not just in the history of science. Let us recall the debate that revolves around that. Earth around Sun or Sun around Earth? What happened to those who declared before the other not accepted at that time by official science and all people?