Economic crisis: who is to blame and what to do - стр. 8

Here is the most sufficient opinion concerning this matter: “The strong differences between male and female brain at the level of organization of some parts of the cortex of the forebrain were revealed. Changing of the lobes of the brain has shown that by men the front half of the brain is more voluminous, and by women – the rear." (Buchstab, 1884). "The part (insula cerebri) of the male brain is significantly different from the part of the female brain. In the male brain the central sulcus part (sulcus centralis insulae) is well expressed in 80% of cases, and in the female brain it is expressed in 65%. Long groove (sulcus longus insulae) in men is found only in 23%, and in women in 35% of cases”. [13]

Previously, social motivators had the feminine origin; they had empathy, female sensitivity. Let us call them social motivators with the features of empathy. Social motivators with traits of empathy feel other people and empathy came into force in accordance with their interests. This allowed the tribes to maintain up to 200 – 300 people, where the head of the tribe was a woman-mother, sometimes her brother. Matriarchy in force of the empathetic property of women was not the absolute power of the latter. It was a harmony of interests of everyone supported by women. And for the sake of everyone, for the most part they agreed to cast out the tribe of those who shook the great power of bringing people together. This force was beneficial psychologically and economically, since it gave the opportunity to increase the social division of labour – the most important factor of the productivity growth in the community. It was woman-like wisely, but the most capable and the most antisocial members of the tribe sometimes suffered.

Yes, it is the latent force of human development. It is hidden behind the relationship of struggle and cooperation between the various psycho-types of people – men and women, social motivators and domain experts. Later it became also the relationship of struggle and cooperation between other psycho-types: extroverts and introverts and others. The further the society went in its development, the greater was the typological diversity inherent to it, the greater role in its development was played by the relationship between the different psychological types. But it is the hidden motive force of social development.

More and more different psycho-types appear with the growth of the social division of labour. The social motivators with the empathic features were changed by the social motivators without the expressed empathy; they were more cunning, more egoistic social motivators with other relative features of a person, which are not good from the social point of view.